Glen Murray’s move

Glen Murray and me at the November 25th Ben Wicks event, with Ralph Benmergui complaining about something in the background. Photo: Shaun Merritt
Glen Murray and me at the November 25th Ben Wicks event, with Ralph Benmergui looking annoyed in the background. Photo: Shaun Merritt

As you have likely heard, Glen Murray, who had been planning a run for mayor of Toronto, has announced that he will seek the provincial Liberal nomination in Toronto Centre to run in the inevitable by-election to replace George Smitherman, who is running for mayor. Glen’s new goal has earned him the support of Smitherman, as well as Liberal activist Todd Ross, who dropped out of the nomination race not only to symbolically support Glen, but also to staff him yesterday as he moved between media interviews. Anything can happen in politics, but taking these factors into account I don’t see any way that he won’t become the Liberal candidate.

A lot of people have asked me what I think of all this because just last week I hosted an event for Glen to help with his budding mayoral bid. In the event invitation I wrote that “I think it really matters that we elect the right mayor, and I’m excited about what Glen’s candidacy could bring.” Now, the questions I’m getting from a surprising number of sources generally fall into one of two categories: how I feel about this development, and do I have any inside information about it? So, here’s my reaction, with a warning: this post is even more self-indulgent than most.

The second question is easier to answer: no, I do not. I can tell you that he was 100% serious about running for mayor. He told the full group at Ben Wicks that he was very likely going to run, but in smaller groups told us that he was near certain. He has been talking to lots of people for at least a few months to lay the groundwork. More recently, however, he was obviously talking to provincial Liberals about this other possibility as well, and that’s the decision he ended up making.

How I know Glen Murray

Glen and I have known of each other for a few years, but have only become friends recently. I knew that he had voted for me (and displayed my sign in his window) in the March 2008 by-election, but we didn’t meet in person until this past May when we were on a panel together as part of the Architecture for Humanity lecture series at the Design Exchange here in Toronto. We got there an hour early and, along with Councillor Joe Mihevc, spent the extra time talking politics in the green room over sandwiches. After the panel Glen and I spoke briefly about each of our future political plans and agreed to meet for lunch or coffee to chat further.

We didn’t actually get around to meeting until October, when we sat in Lettieri at Church and Wellesley and talked for over an hour about municipal politics. It was then that I offered to help Glen with his pre-campaign (for lack of a better term) by hosting an event for him and inviting my contacts. At the event, he told people that he had voted for me (as he had also publicly announced during the panel in May) and that I had won his vote more quickly than any other politician.

He gave me a call yesterday shortly after making his official announcement. We had a brief conversation and agreed to talk more in the near future. He said he had intended to give me a head’s up before his decision became public but hadn’t been able to get in touch with me.

Glen’s decision

Here’s the interesting thing. I had almost no doubt about Glen’s ability to be a great mayor. In terms of ideas and policy he was overflowing with great stuff. From that perspective, Glen Murray may now have a claim to the “greatest mayor Toronto never had” title. However, I saw no evidence (and that doesn’t mean it didn’t exist, just that I didn’t see it) that he was assembling the organizational and fundraising capacity that he would have needed to win the mayoral race. In some ways, it seemed to me he was a platform without a campaign.

Enter George Smitherman, who at this early stage has been accused of being a campaign without a platform. In this way, the two men compliment each other: they each have what the other needs. Politically, therefore, I think this was a good move. The campaign for mayor was becoming pretty crowded and may have been a long-shot for Glen. On the other hand, his election to Queen’s Park now seems very likely.

Some people have commented that they don’t like the feeling that this is a “backroom deal.” I can empathize somewhat, but I don’t think there’s a lot to get worked up over (well, at least no more than usual). On Smitherman’s side, the mayoral race has barely begun. We will have many strong candidates to choose from and nothing resembling a fix is in. As for the Liberal nomination, sorry, but to a certain extent those things have always been determined in backrooms. That’s the way most parties work. (In fact, that’s one of the reasons I’m a Green. Heck, we take it so far in the other direction that we let people challenge our own leader’s nomination!) Then, in the by-election, voters will still have a choice between a large number of candidates and they can pass judgment on if Liberals deserve to hold on to the seat, or if it would be better to send a different message.

What imma do

I’ve let Glen know that I can’t follow him down this road in the same way I would have if he ran for mayor. I don’t think he was surprised, and told me he accepts and respects that decision. Unlike at the municipal level, provincial politics is definitively partisan, and I’m committed to helping elect Greens to Queen’s Park in 2011. That doesn’t mean we won’t continue to find common ground where we can cooperate and work together though, and don’t expect to hear me saying bad things about the guy either. If there’s one thing I’m sure I feel good about it’s that Glen Murray will continue to offer himself to public service. We need more politicians like him. (Don’t go putting that on a flyer though, ok buddy?)

As for the mayoral race, colour me undecided. As I’ve said, it’s early and I think there are some very strong candidates. Let’s see what each of them has to offer.

6 thoughts on “Glen Murray’s move

  1. Perhaps I am unduly cynical about municipal politics, and the involvement of political Party’s. In Toronto, the Liberals, NDP, and a lesser extent the Conservatives are very active. They need to be because the basis of their respective strengths in Toronto are the community groups, and organisations that actually do retail politics on the ground. I suspect that the event at Ben Wicks was a red flag to the Liberals, in respect to the fact that there where a whack of Greens in the room. You can ask Glen, and I’d be curious about the answer, but I suspect that this move was at least partly a pre-emptive measure by the Liberals to deny a foothold to the Greens in Toronto municipal politics.
    To me, it was clear that Glenn was going to get hundreds of Greens on his team had he continued with his bid.
    Such things do happen you know, as I can attest to my own regret.

  2. Disappointing I’m sure. He should have given you a heads-up about it before you threw the party for him. Obviously he wasn’t as committed to running for mayor as he claimed.

  3. That was an excellent post, characteristic of the unvarnished truth and frank speech that I hope remains a hallmark of Greens. A minimum of spin, please, budding politicians! (some is inevitable, but lets keep a watch on it).

    Cathy Crowe came by my door the other night – I wasn’t available – but I would have/will tell her that although I respect her work immensely, I can’t support an NDP that stayed out of the dust-up over religious school funding in the last provincial. So I’ll continue to support the Greens and vote for the Green candidate this election. I also respect Glen Murray, or, at least, his ability, but I’m not voting for more Liberal government at this time.

  4. Nonsense.
    Murray’s track record is announcing something, taking credit for announcing something, then changing jobs before he actually does anything.
    Yesterday his announcement was that he was going to “champion” community development initiatives in each TC neighbourhood. Is he going to create jobs in Rosedale and Moore Park?
    Check out his record in Winnipeg – nothing.
    Announcements, And then nothing.
    Quitting to run for MP. Beaten and leaves town.
    Works as a consultant for a year and a half then as the Urban guru at which he accomplished nothing.
    Read this – quotes from xtra.
    Chris – you are much, much more qualified than Murray. Cathy Crowe is much much more qualified.
    I hear that every time he opens his mouth he loses 100 votes.
    I think he is going to lose and move back to winnipeg to run for Mayor or MP.
    Thing is – is that this is the best chance the Greens will ever have to elect a provincial member – and here you are praising this flake.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *