I suspect that in the eyes of the general public, our leaders are suffering from a “boy who cried wolf” syndrome when it comes to threats of an imminent election. While those of us who are directly involved in party politics have been in perpetual election mode for the last two years, those trying to get on with their daily lives have been perpetually tuned out. (While canvassing tonight, one man told me, “I don’t vote for the bastards, it only encourages them.” Sure enough, he was not on our list of registered voters.) Constant hyper partisanship (which has always existed in some form, but, it seems to me, used to be less mean and destructive, and was at least confined to election campaigns) and an enhanced state of all that’s bad about “politics as usual” have left many people not only not knowing what’s going on in Ottawa, but not caring either.

And yet, we’re once again facing the possibility of a general election triggered by a vote of non-confidence in the government. And while that word—confidence—gets thrown around a lot, it has a real, weighty meaning that we should be cognizant of. While most political parties seem to decide whether or not to force an election based on if it is of political benefit to them, it’s much too important for that kind of cynicism. The real, important, honest question is: should the House have confidence in the government of Stephen Harper?

I should start be declaring that I have a strong personal interest in there not being a general election right now. We’ve already invested in and planned for a by-election. If the government falls before March 17th, then we have to file a return for an election that never happened and then re-register (100 more signatures, another $1000 deposit, a new bank account, etc) for the general election. It would also mean that what is already possibly the longest election campaign in the history of our country would be made even longer, disrupting the personal and professional lives of myself and all of my campaign volunteers.

But this is obviously bigger and more important than me. So while Harper plays games (one of his confidence motions appears to be at odds with a little thing called the constitution) and the other parties posture (the NDP just sent out a testosterone-charged email that amounts to Jack Layton challenging Stephen Harper to a fist fight) or try to make a decision based on what will get them the most votes (an unfortunately frequent preoccupation of Liberal bloggers), we should seriously consider if we can have any confidence in this government.

Let us therefore review this government’s two years in office. They were first elected primarily on issues of accountability and transparency. On both counts, their record is abysmal. For example, The Toronto Sun’s Greg Weston has illustrated how the Conservative “Accountability Act” could actually prevent another sponsorship scandal from being discovered. Speaking of which, Judge Gomery recently complained that Stephen Harper has “abandoned any commitment he once had to transparent government in favour of centralizing power in his own hands” and has “ignored [the Gomery Report’s] key recommendations.” Last week, scientists who work for Environment Canada were “muzzled,” told not to speak the truth to the media lest John Baird be greeted with any “surprises” when he reads his morning paper. A news report explains that this action was taken because “Environment Canada has been one of most open and accessible departments in the federal government,” and that in the government’s determination, that represents “a problem that needs to be remedied.” The list of unbelievable attacks on good government goes on and on (and on).

Going down a list of other issues produces similar conclusions. On the environment, this government has embarrassed us on the international stage, turning opportunities for diplomacy and leadership into wanton displays of childish partisanship and sabotage. They played a key role in preventing as much progress as possible from taking place in Bali and, domestically, have moved us backwards by creating ineffective “policy chaos,” which has also begun to damage our economy. On the topic of the economy, we have a Minister of Finance who appears to not understand basic finance, who tabled a budget that increased our vulnerability to the unfolding economic downturn, and pushed the wrong tax cuts (GST rather than income) at the worst time. When it comes to foreign policy, this government has demonstrated it is either intentionally misleading or incompetent. With regards to social justice, this government tried to rollback human rights by outlawing equal marriage and abandoning the goal of women’s equality.

Today Canada sits on the cusp of great opportunity, created by great challenges. We can take an international leadership position on combating climate change. We can diversify and strengthen our economy. We can resuscitate an independent foreign policy that makes us proud of our role in the world. We can rebuild our cities’ crumbling infrastructure and create the world-class communities we know are possible.

But can we do that with Stephen Harper as prime minister? Do I have confidence in this government? Should Parliament? Should Canadians? Absolutely not.

Democracy is not a game. It is both a gift and a responsibility. And it’s time to exercise it.

6 thoughts on “Confidence

  1. Oh come on Chris. I used to think you were the most non-partisan blogger on the web, even though you’re running for a political party. You’ve normally been quite fair when it comes to challenging the NDP, but “(the NDP just sent out a testosterone-charged email that amounts to Jack Layton challenging Stephen Harper to a fist fight)” was a childishly partisan jab.

    “* NO to a Conservative budget that rewards Harper’s corporate friends while leaving ordinary people behind; and
    * NO to a failing war in Afghanistan. It’s time for a new approach and a peaceful solution.”

    That sounds like it’s challenging Harper to more than just a fist fight and “posturing.” In fact, it sounds curiously like something the Green Party would support.

  2. Hi Ryan,

    It’s true that I’m decidedly more partisan during election campaigns than in-between, which I think is appropriate. With specific reference to the email, I honestly think the headline “We’re ready to take on Harper”, the photo of Layton in a tough-guy pose, and the use of words and phrases like “fight” and “beats the election drums,” as well as the framing of Dion as a wimp (not like the manly Layton) help to contribute to a toxic, confrontational political culture that is turning people off and lowering the discourse. The whole thing is made more rich by the fact that the email’s author simultaneously claims that the NDP isn’t playing politics (“while others electioneer,” “these parties are treating the lives of Canadians like some kind of chess game”).

  3. One of the SEVERAL reasons I left the NDP and joined the Greens was this kind of fundraising/bush-whacking bull from the party – all with Jack Layton himself front and centre. His chest-beating seems childish. Once the party that wanted to “make Parliament work”, the NDP has been smelling Liberal blood for a long time (although the scent may be weakening now) and it would like nothing more than to have another Conservative minority and a few more stern-looking NDP heads to nod in Question Period. And, yes, I too have engaged here in partisan vocabulary. A couple of peeks in at the rabbe babble are enough to whip me into campaign mode – hopefully only after the St. Paddy’s Day byelections. (I live in hope.) :)

  4. You say: “those of us who are directly involved in party politics have been in perpetual election mode for the last two years”

    Ah, a newcomer. Those of us from the original 308 have actually been in perpetual election mode for the last FOUR years, ever since Martin won his Liberal minority. Let me tell you, it’s hard on parties, on candidates, and on people in general. (Great for media, on the other hand).

    Assuming the big election holds off until after March 17, I suppose we can consider you caught up.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *