<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Chris Tindal &#187; propane</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.christindal.ca/tag/propane/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.christindal.ca</link>
	<description>Candidate for city councillor, Ward 27, Toronto</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 16:33:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Propane vs. Uranium</title>
		<link>http://www.christindal.ca/2008/08/11/propane-vs-uranium/</link>
		<comments>http://www.christindal.ca/2008/08/11/propane-vs-uranium/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 19:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Tindal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toronto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nuclear]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[propane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christindal.ca/2008/08/11/propane-vs-uranium/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The images of yesterday&#8217;s propane depot explosion in north Toronto are shocking, with one observer saying the explosion was &#8220;like an atomic bomb.&#8221; And while we can be thankful the casualties weren&#8217;t worse (the area &#8220;got off very lucky&#8221; according to one Toronto Fire Division Commander), my thoughts go out to the families of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.metronews.ca/toronto/Canada/article/96135" target="_blank">images of yesterday&#8217;s propane depot explosion</a> in north Toronto are shocking, with one observer saying <a href="http://www.metronews.ca/toronto/local/article/96212" target="_blank">the explosion was &#8220;like an atomic bomb.&#8221;</a> And while we can be thankful the casualties weren&#8217;t worse (the area &#8220;got off very lucky&#8221; according to one Toronto Fire Division Commander), my thoughts go out to the families of the two individuals reported missing and dead. It&#8217;s a real tragedy.</p>
<p>Residents have now expressed anger that such a potentially dangerous facility was close enough to a residential area to cause damage and death. Of course, they have a point. In response, &#8220;<a href="http://www.metronews.ca/toronto/canada/article/96433" target="_blank">Toronto is launching a review of all areas that could pose a potential hazard to nearby homes</a>&#8221; in order to &#8220;identify any other facilities that may be operating close to residential communities.&#8221; I humbly suggest they not forget to consider Pickering and Darlington in their review, especially considering <a href="http://www.christindal.ca/2007/12/13/leadership-meltdown/">recent nuclear safety developments</a>.</p>
<p>Saturday night as Toronto went to bed, an explosion like the one we saw Sunday morning was unthinkable to most. Tonight as we go to bed, a nuclear accident will be just as unthinkable. As unlikely as such an accident (hopefully) is, it would be terminally devastating. No one wants to have 20/20 hindsight on an accident like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.christindal.ca/2008/08/11/propane-vs-uranium/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
