<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nuclear Still Not Safe</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.christindal.ca/2007/07/17/nuclear-still-not-safe/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.christindal.ca/2007/07/17/nuclear-still-not-safe/</link>
	<description>Shooting my mouth off since 2006</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:05:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve D'Sa</title>
		<link>http://www.christindal.ca/2007/07/17/nuclear-still-not-safe/comment-page-1/#comment-1312</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve D'Sa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 14:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christindal.ca/2007/07/17/nuclear-still-not-safe/#comment-1312</guid>
		<description>TEPCO restated figures in the report. Its was actually 400 drums (or barrels), or four times the amount initially stated. Now the public is worried.

I don&#039;t understand the logic in building nuclear reactors in places where there is potential for huge seismic activity and erratic weather. This is pure arrogance.

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TEPCO restated figures in the report. Its was actually 400 drums (or barrels), or four times the amount initially stated. Now the public is worried.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t understand the logic in building nuclear reactors in places where there is potential for huge seismic activity and erratic weather. This is pure arrogance.</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

