<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nomination Crashers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.christindal.ca/2007/03/26/nomination-crashers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.christindal.ca/2007/03/26/nomination-crashers/</link>
	<description>Shooting my mouth off since 2006</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:05:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Tindal &#187; Nomination Crashers III &#38; IV</title>
		<link>http://www.christindal.ca/2007/03/26/nomination-crashers/comment-page-1/#comment-664</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Tindal &#187; Nomination Crashers III &#38; IV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Jun 2007 00:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christindal.dreamhosters.com/?p=160#comment-664</guid>
		<description>[...] sequels rarely do justice to the original. (Police Academy and Jaws, I&#8217;m looking at you.) Nomination Crashers and Nomination Crashers II were good enough, I probably shouldn&#8217;t push it. But, alas, here we [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] sequels rarely do justice to the original. (Police Academy and Jaws, I&#8217;m looking at you.) Nomination Crashers and Nomination Crashers II were good enough, I probably shouldn&#8217;t push it. But, alas, here we [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Tindal &#187; Nomination Crashers II</title>
		<link>http://www.christindal.ca/2007/03/26/nomination-crashers/comment-page-1/#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Tindal &#187; Nomination Crashers II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 03:15:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.christindal.dreamhosters.com/?p=160#comment-328</guid>
		<description>[...] Unfortunately, I also don&#8217;t have any (mildly) amusing stories like the one that came out of crashing the Liberal nomination meeting. The winner of the nomination was El-Farouk Khaki, who out-polled Sandra Gonzalez. I&#8217;ve gotten to know El-Farouk a little bit over the past few weeks (he and I, as well as our Conservative opponent Mark Warner, have been showing up at a lot of the same community events), and I really like him. He seems very genuine and friendly, and has an impressive resume and life story. Knowing the full list of &#8220;major party&#8221; candidates (in order of nomination: me, Green Party; Mark Warner, Conservative; Bob Rae, Liberal; El-Farouk Khaki, NDP), it&#8217;s now clear that Toronto Centre is going to be one of the most fun and exciting ridings to watch in the next campaign. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Unfortunately, I also don&#8217;t have any (mildly) amusing stories like the one that came out of crashing the Liberal nomination meeting. The winner of the nomination was El-Farouk Khaki, who out-polled Sandra Gonzalez. I&#8217;ve gotten to know El-Farouk a little bit over the past few weeks (he and I, as well as our Conservative opponent Mark Warner, have been showing up at a lot of the same community events), and I really like him. He seems very genuine and friendly, and has an impressive resume and life story. Knowing the full list of &#8220;major party&#8221; candidates (in order of nomination: me, Green Party; Mark Warner, Conservative; Bob Rae, Liberal; El-Farouk Khaki, NDP), it&#8217;s now clear that Toronto Centre is going to be one of the most fun and exciting ridings to watch in the next campaign. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

